2255 petitioner prevails on a Fourth Amendment ineffective assistance of counsel claim. There clearly was no probable cause for defendant\u2019s arrest and car search. United States v. Henry, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133252 (N.D. Ind. July 10, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The government says it\u2019s not going to use the product of the search warrant at trial, so the question is moot. United States v. Banyan, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133410 (S.D.N.Y. July 14, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
There was a reasonable inference that stolen property would be found on defendant\u2019s property after he was seen driving a stolen UTV. State v. Barton, 2025 Ore. App. LEXIS 1181 (July 9, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Appellate counsel wasn\u2019t ineffective for not appealing the denials of suppression motions because none of them would have prevailed. Hill v. United States, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133300 (E.D. Mo. July 14, 2025).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
2255 petitioner prevails on a Fourth Amendment ineffective assistance of counsel claim. There clearly was no probable cause for defendant\u2019s arrest and car search. United States v. Henry, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133252 (N.D. Ind. July 10, 2025).* The government … Continue reading