Giving a substantial amount of cash to a courier to take it from Arizona to Maryland doesn\u2019t create standing. United States v. $549,860.00 in United States Currency, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 131436 (S.D. Ill. July 10, 2025).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant\u2019s place was raided in an anticipatory warrant and he first said that both cell phones there were his. Later, he said it was the shock of the arrest and only the iPhone was his. This became abandonment of the other phone. United States v. Morgan, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 17218 (11th Cir. July 11, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The use of deadly force here was apparently justified by the video, and it all happened in seconds. The officers violated no constitutional right, so the question of whether it was clearly established doesn\u2019t have to be decided. Heid v. Rutkoski, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 17090 (11th Cir. July 10, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Plaintiff\u2019s claim that surveillance of him was \u201cillegal,\u201d without more doesn\u2019t state a claim. Jabr v. Dep’t of Taxation, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132236 (S.D. Ohio July 11, 2025).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Giving a substantial amount of cash to a courier to take it from Arizona to Maryland doesn\u2019t create standing. United States v. $549,860.00 in United States Currency, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 131436 (S.D. Ill. July 10, 2025). Defendant\u2019s place was … Continue reading