Conflict of laws: Defendant\u2019s arrest and search was in Kansas City, Missouri, but his offense was tried in Kansas City, Kansas. State law on this doesn\u2019t matter. Applying the Fourth Amendment, it was all legal. State v. Green, 2025 Kan. LEXIS 149 (June 27, 2025).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The weapons surrender statute for orders of protection didn\u2019t violate the Fourth Amendment. He had production immunity. In re Domestic Violence Prot. Ord. for Montesi, 2025 Wash. App. LEXIS 1273 (June 30, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant\u2019s cell phone was searched under a state warrant, but the case went dormant. Three years later, a federal search warrant was issued. The state warrant was without probable cause, but good faith saves it. Defendant\u2019s claim on the federal warrant depends on that. (Reasonableness of the delay apparently not argued.) United States v. McGee, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123935 (E.D. Mich. June 30, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Prison strip searches after video visitation were committed to the discretion of the warden. The fact nothing was found isn\u2019t really material. Ingram v. Squier, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123892 (W.D. Va. June 30, 2025).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Conflict of laws: Defendant\u2019s arrest and search was in Kansas City, Missouri, but his offense was tried in Kansas City, Kansas. State law on this doesn\u2019t matter. Applying the Fourth Amendment, it was all legal. State v. Green, 2025 Kan. … Continue reading