The affidavit for search warrant shows sufficient references to recent time to show it was not stale. \u201cPut plainly, the Sixth Circuit does not require a search warrant affidavit to include the temporal specificity which Hardaway suggests is necessary. Rather, an affiant need only include \u2018some temporal reference,\u2019 to when a controlled buy occurred for it to be properly considered in the probable cause determination. United States v. Hython, 443 F.3d 480, 486 (6th Cir. 2006).\u201d United States v. Hardaway, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108568 (E.D. Ky. June 9, 2025).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in a vehicle\u2019s VIN number such that it can\u2019t be used to verify insurance. Bradley v. Ill. Sec’y of State, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108842 (N.D. Ill. June 9, 2025).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Uncertainty about what the trial court held in not believing the officers in granting a motion to suppress results in remand for further findings. State v. Mickel, 2025 Ga. LEXIS 125 (June 10, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Presented as an effort to suppress, defendant can\u2019t get discovery of how Snap operates in an effort to show that it is not a private actor in providing a CSAM tip to law enforcement. United States v. Ambrose, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108772 (M.D. Fla. June 9, 2025).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The affidavit for search warrant shows sufficient references to recent time to show it was not stale. \u201cPut plainly, the Sixth Circuit does not require a search warrant affidavit to include the temporal specificity which Hardaway suggests is necessary. Rather, … Continue reading