Paying daily \u201crent\u201d in drugs is a business transaction without standing. \u201cAlthough Jackson was an overnight guest insofar as he slept on the couch in the living room, he told law enforcement officers in his interview that he paid McCallister in pills for the ability to stay there and otherwise supplied her with drugs. The transactional nature of the relationship indicates that Jackson may have been a business visitor; it is not clear that he and McCallister enjoyed the level of mutual trust inherent in a social relationship that would give rise to a reasonable expectation of privacy within her home.\u201d United States v. Jackson, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107978 (S.D. W. Va. June 6, 2025).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A statement in a search warrant affidavit that a box of ammunition could be seen inside a store plastic bag wasn\u2019t shown to be false. \u201cClear enough\u201d to see isn\u2019t false. United States v. Hobson, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106846 (N.D. Tex. June 5, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cIn this case, officers received multiple 911 calls that there was an active shooter. The responding officers had objectively reasonable and particularized suspicion that the plaintiff committed or was committing a crime; they were allowed to detain him until the officers were able to determine if he had committed a crime. Plaintiff was detained only as long as it took the officers to determine he had not committed a crime. Thus, Plaintiff fails to state a claim for a Fourth Amendment violation.\u201d Tholley v. AAA Pediatrics, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104573 (E.D. Va. June 2, 2025).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Paying daily \u201crent\u201d in drugs is a business transaction without standing. \u201cAlthough Jackson was an overnight guest insofar as he slept on the couch in the living room, he told law enforcement officers in his interview that he paid McCallister … Continue reading