Defendant\u2019s computer was seized and searched for child pornography. After the initial warrant, the government applied for permission to reexamine the computer media. The second look was justified, and the good faith exception applies because it involves reliance on a court order. United States v. Doub, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79235 (S.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2025).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Whether Stone applies in a 2255 is an open question in the Second Circuit. That doesn\u2019t have to be decided because the Fourth Amendment claim loses on the merits. Pierce v. United States, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79270 (W.D.N.Y. Apr. 25, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
2241 petitioner\u2019s claim that the Fourth Amendment wasn\u2019t complied with for bringing him to court isn\u2019t a ground for relief. In re Lumpkin, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 10034 (11th Cir. Apr. 25, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The officer\u2019s finding marijuana in the passenger compartment supported a search of the trunk. United States v. Contreras, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79325 (S.D. Tex. Apr. 25, 2025).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Defendant\u2019s computer was seized and searched for child pornography. After the initial warrant, the government applied for permission to reexamine the computer media. The second look was justified, and the good faith exception applies because it involves reliance on a … Continue reading