Squatters have no reasonable expectation of privacy in the property they\u2019ve appropriated. Lewis v. Blakeslee, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75568 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 21, 2025).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In a written order denying an arrest warrant of a male victim of an alleged sexual assault by a female, the judge\u2019s comments were offensive and he\u2019s removed. In re Hanson, 2025 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 47 (Apr. 18, 2025),* also noted in Legal Profession Blog\u2019s Magistrate Removed From Office<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cWhat Larry Anthany experienced amid the chaos the Springfield police encountered upon arriving at the Greer’s home was far from an obvious violation of his Fourth Amendment right to be free from an unreasonable seizure. At the very least-and even though he bears the burden of showing Officers Johnson and Valenti are not entitled to the defense of qualified immunity-Larry Anthany has not pointed us to a case that clearly establishes his right to be free from forcible, temporary detainment when he confronted police officers responding to a volatile situation with a baseball bat and then told the officers that he wanted to be released so he could go fight his sister’s boyfriend. We know of no case clearly informing the officers that their actions violated the Fourth Amendment. [\u00b6] Quite the opposite. Our case law provides that officers may detain a person to ensure officer safety or the safety of others, so long as the infringement on the person’s liberty is proportionate to the safety concern.\u201d Cave v. Valenti, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 9405 (7th Cir. Apr. 21, 2025).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Squatters have no reasonable expectation of privacy in the property they\u2019ve appropriated. Lewis v. Blakeslee, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75568 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 21, 2025). In a written order denying an arrest warrant of a male victim of an alleged … Continue reading