{"id":60866,"date":"2025-04-19T13:27:30","date_gmt":"2025-04-19T18:27:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=60866"},"modified":"2025-04-19T13:27:30","modified_gmt":"2025-04-19T18:27:30","slug":"ca6-ptfs-%c2%a7-1983-case-over-his-traffic-stop-and-tickets-barred-by-younger","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=60866","title":{"rendered":"CA6: Ptf&#8217;s \u00a7 1983 case over his traffic stop and tickets barred by <em>Younger<\/em>"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Plaintiff was ticketed by officers of the Kirkland PD, one for having a fictitious license plate, and he sued in federal court claiming Fourth Amendment and right to travel violations and the city had no jurisdiction over him. Younger bars the action. Harris v. City of Kirtland, Inc., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 9141 (6th Cir. Apr. 16, 2025).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The alleged civil Franks violation was neither a misrepresentation nor material. Jackson v. Rosen, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72934 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 17, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cA defendant who neither sends nor is the listed recipient of a parcel generally does not have a subjective expectation of privacy in its contents. \u2026 On the face of the parcels, someone other than McCurdy sent them and someone other than McCurdy was to receive them. Without more, the facts do not present a reasonable expectation of privacy in the parcels sufficient to bring the Fourth Amendment challenge McCurdy now asserts.\u201d United States v. McCurdy, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73064 (N.D. Ohio Apr. 17, 2025).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Plaintiff was ticketed by officers of the Kirkland PD, one for having a fictitious license plate, and he sued in federal court claiming Fourth Amendment and right to travel violations and the city had no jurisdiction over him. Younger bars &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=60866\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[21,126,99,34],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-60866","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-franks-doctrine","category-issue-preclusion","category-mail-and-packages","category-standing"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60866","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=60866"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60866\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":60867,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60866\/revisions\/60867"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=60866"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=60866"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=60866"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}