Defendant\u2019s backyard is curtilage, and the entry suppressed. United States v. Ringleb, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75030 (D.N.M. Apr. 18, 2025).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority (CMHA) Police Department conducted an entry under the basic lease agreement that permitted \u201c\u2018a duly authorized CMHA agent, employee, or representative\u2019 to enter his apartment to perform maintenance and conduct inspections. Absent emergencies, the lease required CMHA to provide St. John with 48-hour notice before entering his unit.\u201d The officers get qualified immunity for their entry under the lease agreement. St. John v. Cuyahoga Metro. Hous. Auth., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 9351 (6th Cir. Apr. 18, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant\u2019s traffic stop for not signaling coming out of an alley was objectively reasonable. Reasonable suspicion developed to extend the stop. United States v. O’Brien, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74972 (D. Idaho Apr. 18, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Petitioner brings seven claims in a successor petition, including a Fourth Amendment claim. None of them satisfy the successor rule. In re Boswell, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 9278 (5th Cir. Apr. 18, 2025).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Defendant\u2019s backyard is curtilage, and the entry suppressed. United States v. Ringleb, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75030 (D.N.M. Apr. 18, 2025). The Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority (CMHA) Police Department conducted an entry under the basic lease agreement that permitted \u201c\u2018a … Continue reading