{"id":60698,"date":"2025-04-04T16:36:32","date_gmt":"2025-04-04T21:36:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=60698"},"modified":"2025-04-05T08:57:12","modified_gmt":"2025-04-05T13:57:12","slug":"ca8-two-specific-911-calls-satisfied-navarette","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=60698","title":{"rendered":"CA8: Two specific 911 calls satisfied <em>Navarette<\/em>"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Two 911 calls about erratic driving involving a black Volvo led to defendant\u2019s stop, and that was sufficient for Navarette. While checking defendant\u2019s license, the officer asked about his travel plans, and he said he came from California to help set up a pizza stand at the Iowa State Fair, except it wasn\u2019t for about 10 days and the stop was in South Dakota. That was suspicious enough for a dog sniff. <a href=\"https:\/\/ecf.ca8.uscourts.gov\/opndir\/25\/04\/241324P.pdf\">United States v. Gonzalez<\/a>, 24-1324 (8th Cir. Apr. 4, 2025).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>2255 petitioner\u2019s guilty plea waived his Fourth Amendment claim. Smith v. United States, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 7830 (6th Cir. Apr. 2, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cViewing the remaining disputed facts in Ledbetter&#8217;s favor, as well as the factual underpinnings of the jury&#8217;s special verdict, Helmers was faced with a compliant, non-resisting felon who posed minimal threat to officers or the public. Helmers chose to body-slam that individual with catastrophic force without warning. Under those circumstances, a reasonable jury could find that choice was unreasonable. Because a reasonable jury could find those circumstances to be true, the district court should not have resolved Helmers&#8217;s qualified immunity motion on that ground.\u201d Ledbetter v. Helmers, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 7819 (8th Cir. Apr. 3, 2025).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Two 911 calls about erratic driving involving a black Volvo led to defendant\u2019s stop, and that was sufficient for Navarette. While checking defendant\u2019s license, the officer asked about his travel plans, and he said he came from California to help &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=60698\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[40,35,129],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-60698","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-qualified-immunity","category-reasonable-suspicion","category-waiver"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60698","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=60698"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60698\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":60709,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60698\/revisions\/60709"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=60698"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=60698"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=60698"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}