There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in non-legal mail in jail. Here, mail was scanned and made into a pdf for viewing on a tablet. Cecil v. Keller, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56313 (W.D. Va. Mar. 25, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A FedEx employee delivered a package to defendant\u2019s house that a drug dog had already alerted on, but it hadn\u2019t been opened. He said that the house had an overpowering smell of marijuana coming from it from 50′ away. Then police got a warrant for the package and the house. It was with probable cause. United States v. Randle, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 7028 (7th Cir. Mar. 26, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant\u2019s Franks challenge is over whether a toilet seat cover was up or down enabling a plain view. This isn\u2019t the type of challenge permitted by Franks because it only shows a desire to cross-examine. United States v. Reyes, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56163 (W.D. Ky. Mar. 25, 2025).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in non-legal mail in jail. Here, mail was scanned and made into a pdf for viewing on a tablet. Cecil v. Keller, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56313 (W.D. Va. Mar. 25, 2025).* A … Continue reading