\u201cHerndon’s argument that her rights under the Fourth Amendment were violated when the superior court \u2018commingled [her] private filings making it public\u2019 is without merit. Herndon has no reasonable expectation of privacy in information that she voluntarily submitted to the government.\u201d In re A Change of Name for Herndon, 2025 Alas. LEXIS 42 (Mar. 19, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The officer was looking for a red Honda Civic and saw defendant in one as it passed him near the scene of the alleged crime. There was reasonable suspicion for the stop. \u201cLooking at the totality of the circumstances here–the \u2018whole picture\u2019–if Richey was a \u2018close question\u2019 on reasonable suspicion, this case lands much closer to a slam dunk.\u201d State v. Solom, 2025 Wisc. App. LEXIS 262 (Mar. 19, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
There are questions of fact as to both the justification for the stop and the use of force here. Summary judgment denied. Q.M. v. Cty. of L.A., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49466 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
2254 successor petition for a later probation search is barred. In re Barringer, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 6358 (11th Cir. Mar. 18, 2025).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u201cHerndon’s argument that her rights under the Fourth Amendment were violated when the superior court \u2018commingled [her] private filings making it public\u2019 is without merit. Herndon has no reasonable expectation of privacy in information that she voluntarily submitted to the … Continue reading