There was an objective basis for defendant\u2019s stop, even if the officer had subjective motives. State v. Olson, 2025 Wash. App. LEXIS 423 (Mar. 11, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant was in prison for about 20 years and there were phone calls between him and his wife. A search warrant for a drug operation was executed at her home. The [thorny] question of his standing to challenge the search of her home when he\u2019s in prison for so long is mooted by finding probable cause, which there clearly was. United States v. Lott, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 5701 (11th Cir. Mar. 12, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
NYC boots and tows vehicles with more than $350 in unpaid parking tickets. Mercedes-Benz Financial has a lien on some of these vehicles. \u201cThe \u2018towing and impoundment of vehicles\u2019 based on valid parking-and traffic-ticket judgments and authorized under New York City Administrative Code \u00a7 19-212 and New York Vehicular & Traffic Law \u00a7 237(5) is \u2018reasonable under the Fourth Amendment.\u2019\u201d [Citing a bunch of cases.] Mercedes-Benz Fin. Servs. USA, LLC v. City of New York, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43551 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 11, 2025).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
There was an objective basis for defendant\u2019s stop, even if the officer had subjective motives. State v. Olson, 2025 Wash. App. LEXIS 423 (Mar. 11, 2025).* Defendant was in prison for about 20 years and there were phone calls between … Continue reading