Information in the affidavit for warrant about a 2021 overdose was valid background and not stale information. State v. Martin, 2025 Ohio App. LEXIS 727 (6th Dist. Mar. 7, 2025).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Officers getting a search warrant to enter to arrest was what they can do. The defense argument that doing that means they didn\u2019t have reason to enter [to me] doesn\u2019t even follow. Also, it \u201cdisincentivizes officers from seeking search warrants out of fear that courts will read their actions as evidencing a lack of reasonable belief or probable cause.\u201d [Besides, the issuance of a search warrant almost always shows probable cause, doesn\u2019t it?] United States v. Maiden, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38434 (W.D. Ky. Mar. 4, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
An arrest allegedly without probable cause doesn\u2019t prevent the government from later trying the accused. Evidence related to the faulty arrest may be excludable, but none is identified here. United States v. Robinson, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38422 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 4, 2025).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Information in the affidavit for warrant about a 2021 overdose was valid background and not stale information. State v. Martin, 2025 Ohio App. LEXIS 727 (6th Dist. Mar. 7, 2025). Officers getting a search warrant to enter to arrest was … Continue reading