Even if the officers (mis)handled the drugs during the search, they\u2019d still come into evidence at trial. United States v. McDonald, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11844 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 22, 2025).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The trial court suppressed this cell phone search as overbroad and the good faith exception didn\u2019t apply. The state appealed then confessed the trial court was right. People v. Burns, 2025 Mich. App. LEXIS 529 (Jan. 22, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Plaintiff\u2019s Fourth Amendment privacy claim about a conversation in the police station that a police officer listened to was properly denied. Reed v. Swanson, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 1295 (6th Cir. Jan. 21, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
There was reasonable suspicion to extend the traffic stop based on the totality of the circumstances, including one appearing under the influence of drugs and their nervousness and failure to make eye contact and their prior drug offense histories. State v. Rose, 2025-Ohio-143 (4th Dist. Jan. 9, 2025).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Even if the officers (mis)handled the drugs during the search, they\u2019d still come into evidence at trial. United States v. McDonald, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11844 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 22, 2025). The trial court suppressed this cell phone search as … Continue reading