Photographs could be taken during execution of a search warrant. United States v. Schultz, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 236848 (D. Minn. Dec. 2, 2024), adopted, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4918 (D. Minn. Jan. 10, 2025).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In a case involving whether defendant was felon in possession for this underlying crime, he is precluded by the government\u2019s motion in limine from arguing the government\u2019s conduct violated the Fourth Amendment, too. United States v. Romero, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4212 (D. Alaska Jan. 8, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Stopping in the crosswalk justified defendant\u2019s stop. State v. Shay, 2025-Ohio-71 (3d Dist. Jan. 13, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant would not have felt free to leave when he was approached by officers, handcuffed and moved a few feet away to sit down. All this was, however, with probable cause. United States v. Williams, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5932 (N.D. Tex. Jan. 13, 2025).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Photographs could be taken during execution of a search warrant. United States v. Schultz, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 236848 (D. Minn. Dec. 2, 2024), adopted, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4918 (D. Minn. Jan. 10, 2025). In a case involving whether … Continue reading