{"id":59515,"date":"2024-12-06T14:06:32","date_gmt":"2024-12-06T19:06:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=59515"},"modified":"2024-12-07T08:21:31","modified_gmt":"2024-12-07T13:21:31","slug":"w-d-mich-search-and-seizure-brady-even-if-there-was-one-wouldnt-change-the-outcome","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=59515","title":{"rendered":"W.D.Mich.: Search and seizure <em>Brady<\/em>, even if there was one, wouldn&#8217;t change the outcome"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Defendant makes a 2255 Brady claim about the information for his search and seizure. But, it doesn\u2019t change the outcome. \u201cDefendant fails to explain, and the Court fails to discern, how inclusion of the information Defendant sets forth in support of his claim would have altered that outcome in any way. Thus, the Court cannot agree with Defendant that any Brady violation occurred.\u201d Wilson v. United States, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 219104 (W.D. Mich. Dec. 4, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Defendant\u2019s overtinted windows justified his stop. The officer could not determine the gender of the driver. State v. Fleckinger, 2024-Ohio-5659 (1st Dist. Dec. 4, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The search warrant was based partly on a CI\u2019s tip and information from other law enforcement agencies and was based on probable cause. It also was all done in good faith. United States v. Ward, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 217486 (E.D. Tenn. Dec. 2, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Defendant\u2019s stop was based on a CI\u2019s statement, and the CI had a substantial track record with the police and was sufficiently corroborated. United States v. Ellington, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 218599 (M.D. Ala. Oct. 25, 2024),* adopted, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 217277 (M.D. Ala. Dec. 2, 2024).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Defendant makes a 2255 Brady claim about the information for his search and seizure. But, it doesn\u2019t change the outcome. \u201cDefendant fails to explain, and the Court fails to discern, how inclusion of the information Defendant sets forth in support &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=59515\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[44,35],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-59515","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-informant-hearsay","category-reasonable-suspicion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59515","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=59515"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59515\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":59526,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59515\/revisions\/59526"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=59515"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=59515"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=59515"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}