No search warrant is needed for the jail to turn over plaintiff\u2019s jail telephone calls to the DA\u2019s office. Wallace v. Maricopa Cty. Prosecutor’s Office, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209545 (D. Ariz. Oct. 24, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
When an officer invokes the implied consent statute in a DUI case, the procedures must be followed or suppression occurs. State v. Flynn, 2024 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 91 (Nov. 15, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cThis Court finds, after looking at the totality of the circumstances, that Logwood’s consent to search the vehicle was voluntary. Therefore, Nugent had probable cause to search the vehicle based on Logwood’s consent as well as based on the detection of the odor of marijuana and Logwood’s admission that marijuana was inside.\u201d United States v. Logwood, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 207844 (W.D. La. Oct. 29, 2024),* adopted, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 206534 (W.D. La. Nov. 13, 2024).* [Court could have gone with probable cause and not even decided consent.]<\/p>\n\n\n\n
An NYPD officer sued the homeowner for defective stairs he fell down during execution of a search warrant. He lost. Fahim v. De Leon, 2024 NY Slip Op 51558(U) (Richmond Co. Nov. 8, 2024).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
No search warrant is needed for the jail to turn over plaintiff\u2019s jail telephone calls to the DA\u2019s office. Wallace v. Maricopa Cty. Prosecutor’s Office, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209545 (D. Ariz. Oct. 24, 2024).* When an officer invokes the … Continue reading