A 48 hour pretrial detainee in a dry cell has no reasonable expectation of privacy. United States v. Burk, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209407 (D. Alaska Nov. 18, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant\u2019s Franks officer of proof with a proffered corrected affidavit for warrant still shows probable cause. The complained about mistake wasn\u2019t material to the probable cause and it wasn\u2019t intentional. \u201cEven if we found merit in Lenhart’s principal arguments, the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule would apply.\u201d United States v. Lenhart, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 208550 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 18, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
There was reasonable suspicion on the totality to detain and handcuff defendant for stalking. United States v. Hoffpowier, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 207974 (E.D. Tenn. Sep. 23, 2024),* adopted, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 207043 (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 14, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The officer had reasonable suspicion and probable cause for defendant\u2019s stop. He was looking for him and confirmed it was him from a booking photo he had. United States v. Virrueta, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 29017 (8th Cir. Nov. 15, 2024).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
A 48 hour pretrial detainee in a dry cell has no reasonable expectation of privacy. United States v. Burk, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209407 (D. Alaska Nov. 18, 2024).* Defendant\u2019s Franks officer of proof with a proffered corrected affidavit for … Continue reading