Defendant\u2019s DUI stop justified a search for open containers, and a firearm was validly found. United States v. Stuckey, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 207801 (N.D. Iowa Nov. 15, 2024).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant moved to suppress a cell phone warrant at the border at JFK airport. He declined to provide an affidavit of standing despite being told it was required and instead relied on the criminal complaint. Denied without a hearing. United States v. Arteaga, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 206361 (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 13, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The affidavit for warrant of defendant\u2019s house was based on a CI\u2019s information that drugs would be present and investigation that defendant would leave the house to go to drug deals. Gibout v. State, 2024 Ark. App. 568 (Nov. 12, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201c[T]he decision to impound a vehicle is reasonable if there is a valid reason to move it, a legitimate basis to hold it for further investigation, or if there is no other person present who can safely drive it away.\u201d The burden is on the state, and here they failed. People v. Essic, 2024 NY Slip Op 51517(U) (Kings Co. Nov. 13, 2024).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Defendant\u2019s DUI stop justified a search for open containers, and a firearm was validly found. United States v. Stuckey, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 207801 (N.D. Iowa Nov. 15, 2024). Defendant moved to suppress a cell phone warrant at the border … Continue reading