Affirmed per curiam. The concurring opinion: The facts concerning the stop and search in the appeal brief demonstrate a serious lack of candor which the state didn\u2019t even challenge. All counsel included was his cross-examination and omitted the state\u2019s direct which showed the basis for the stop. Shelgren v. State, 2024 Fla. App. LEXIS 8543 (Fla. 1st DCA Nov. 6, 2024) (concurring opinion).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defense counsel wasn\u2019t ineffective at trial for not calling defense counsel who litigated the motion to suppress for not calling a witness when review is limited to the four corners of the affidavit. United States v. Walker, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 201164 (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 5, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The officer conducted a valid plain view by walking past defendant\u2019s car and seeing the gun. State v. Smith, 2024-Ohio-5280 (7th Dist. Oct. 29, 2024).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Affirmed per curiam. The concurring opinion: The facts concerning the stop and search in the appeal brief demonstrate a serious lack of candor which the state didn\u2019t even challenge. All counsel included was his cross-examination and omitted the state\u2019s direct … Continue reading