Plaintiff\u2019s \u00a7 1983 suit for return of property is denied because there is a state law remedy, even if a federal claim was barred by Heck. Owens v. Samuel, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189894 (W.D. Ark. Sep. 24, 2024), adopted, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189309 (W.D. Ark. Oct. 17, 2024).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The SOL for plaintiff\u2019s search claim accrued at the time it happened. This was filed four years too late. Delarosa v. Vill. of Romeoville, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 26333 (7th Cir. Oct. 18, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cThe video recordings from the officers’ body-worn cameras undisputably establish that the officers acted reasonably under the circumstances, even if Leonard did not “point” the gun at them. The recordings show that the officers shot Leonard after she reached for the gun in her waistband despite the officers telling her not to do so. Because the officers reasonably defended themselves from the threat of deadly harm, we affirm.\u201d Reynolds v. Shelton, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 26391 (7th Cir. Oct. 18, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant\u2019s patdown found a \u201clarge bulky item\u201d and then defendant attempted to flee. There was reasonable suspicion. United States v. Anderson, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189763 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 17, 2024).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Plaintiff\u2019s \u00a7 1983 suit for return of property is denied because there is a state law remedy, even if a federal claim was barred by Heck. Owens v. Samuel, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189894 (W.D. Ark. Sep. 24, 2024), adopted, … Continue reading