With collective knowledge there was reason to extend the stop. United States v. McAliley, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 25982 (3d Cir. Oct. 15, 2024).* (After all, collective knowledge applies to reasonable suspicion too.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The USMJ\u2019s decision denying the motion to suppress is upheld. There\u2019s no way the officer would have a way of knowing the search warrant was without probable cause, and the good faith exception applies. United States v. Kennedy, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 187587 (D. Alaska Oct. 14, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Plaintiff\u2019s passive resistance didn\u2019t justify his Tasing. \u201cConsidering the totality of the circumstances and the application of the three Graham factors, Sgt. Beasley’s decision to tase Jackson-Gibson was objectively unreasonable. Jackson-Gibson’s alleged crimes were not serious. He did not pose an immediate threat to any officer. And he was not actively resisting or evading arrest. Therefore, the district court did not err in holding that a reasonable jury could find that Sgt. Beasley violated Jackson-Gibson’s Fourth Amendment right to be free from excessive force.\u201d Jackson-Gibson v. Beasley, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 25850 (6th Cir. Oct. 15, 2024).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
With collective knowledge there was reason to extend the stop. United States v. McAliley, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 25982 (3d Cir. Oct. 15, 2024).* (After all, collective knowledge applies to reasonable suspicion too.) The USMJ\u2019s decision denying the motion to … Continue reading