{"id":58949,"date":"2024-09-25T11:09:17","date_gmt":"2024-09-25T16:09:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=58949"},"modified":"2024-09-25T11:09:17","modified_gmt":"2024-09-25T16:09:17","slug":"ct-exigency-shown-for-animal-control-entry","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=58949","title":{"rendered":"CT: Exigency shown for animal control entry"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>\u201cOur scrupulous examination of the entire record supports the court&#8217;s conclusion that the officers had reasonable cause to believe that the dogs contained within the barn were in imminent harm and neglected, or cruelly treated.\u201d <a href=\"https:\/\/www.jud.ct.gov\/external\/supapp\/Cases\/AROap\/AP228\/AP228.307.pdf\">City of Middletown v. Wagner<\/a>, 2024 Conn. App. LEXIS 245 (Sep. 24, 2024).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Defendant\u2019s application for a writ against his search warrant for a typo discovered 12 years later is too late, and didn\u2019t matter anyway. State v. Workman, 2024 La. App. LEXIS 1503 (La. App. 5 Cir Sep. 23, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In objecting to the R&amp;R: \u201cDefendant&#8217;s second objection is a general one. Other than stating his disagreement with the conclusion that the two warrantless seizures of defendant&#8217;s cell phone were not violations of the Fourth Amendment, defendant does not point to or explain the source of any error or mistake in the R&amp;R&#8217;s reasoning.\u201d United States v. Smith, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170276 (E.D. Tenn. Sep. 20, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The magistrate\u2019s determination in the R&amp;R was that plain view applied. Defendant\u2019s objection to the warrant was not at all responsive. United States v. Bankhead, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170666 (D. Minn. Sep. 23, 2024).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u201cOur scrupulous examination of the entire record supports the court&#8217;s conclusion that the officers had reasonable cause to believe that the dogs contained within the barn were in imminent harm and neglected, or cruelly treated.\u201d City of Middletown v. Wagner, &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=58949\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[104,3,129],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-58949","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-burden-of-pleading","category-emergency-exigency","category-waiver"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58949","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=58949"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58949\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":58950,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58949\/revisions\/58950"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=58949"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=58949"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=58949"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}