\u201cThe Court finds that when Officers Zinn and Jasso placed the stop sticks and attempted to remove the subject from his vehicle, they had a reasonable, articulable suspicion that the individual behind the wheel of the Dodge Charger was involved in drug transactions. Given the Court’s finding that the officers had a reasonable, articulable suspicion that criminal activity may be afoot and, thus, were justified in conducting an investigative stop, no constitutional violation took place in the initial seizure, that is the attempt by the officers to remove defendant Greer from the vehicle and to hinder defendant Greer’s ability to flee by the placement of the stop sticks.\u201d United States v. Greer, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166456 (W.D. Mo. Aug. 12, 2024), adopted, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 165105 (W.D. Mo. Sep. 13, 2024).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The PO here wasn\u2019t only relying on defendant\u2019s criminal history for a parole search. There was more. United States v. Vano, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166305 (D. Kan. Sep. 16, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
There was probable cause for plaintiff\u2019s arrest for bringing a gun on school property, no matter the officer\u2019s subjective intentions. Bracken v. Twp. of Manor, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 23545 (3d Cir. Sep. 17, 2024).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u201cThe Court finds that when Officers Zinn and Jasso placed the stop sticks and attempted to remove the subject from his vehicle, they had a reasonable, articulable suspicion that the individual behind the wheel of the Dodge Charger was involved … Continue reading