{"id":58866,"date":"2024-09-11T08:04:51","date_gmt":"2024-09-11T13:04:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=58866"},"modified":"2024-09-11T08:04:51","modified_gmt":"2024-09-11T13:04:51","slug":"d-n-j-fictitious-tags-stop-justifies-si","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=58866","title":{"rendered":"D.N.J.: Fictitious tags stop justifies SI"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Based on circuit authority, a stop and arrest for fictitious tags justifies a search incident on the driver. United States v. Jones, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 161352 (E.D. Wis. Sep. 9, 2024), quoting United States v. Travis, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 29386 (7th Cir. Nov. 3, 2023).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201c[T]he Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule does not apply to the seizure of records from a third-party bank, even where the Government engages in chicanery to acquire those records. See, e.g, United States v. Nolan-Cooper, 155 F.3d 221, 229 (3d Cir. 1998) (discussing United States v. Payner, 447 U.S. 727, 735 (1980)).\u201d Bush-Rowland v. United States, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 161384 (D.N.J. Sep. 9, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Defendant\u2019s improper left turn was justification for his stop that led to reasonable suspicion she was under the influence. State v. Sugden, 2024-Ohio-4442 (9th Dist. Sep. 9, 2024).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Based on circuit authority, a stop and arrest for fictitious tags justifies a search incident on the driver. United States v. Jones, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 161352 (E.D. Wis. Sep. 9, 2024), quoting United States v. Travis, 2023 U.S. App. &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=58866\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,35,26,79],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-58866","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-exclusionary-rule","category-reasonable-suspicion","category-search-incident","category-third-party-doctrine"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58866","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=58866"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58866\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":58867,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58866\/revisions\/58867"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=58866"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=58866"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=58866"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}