{"id":58788,"date":"2024-08-30T19:18:35","date_gmt":"2024-08-31T00:18:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=58788"},"modified":"2024-08-30T19:19:47","modified_gmt":"2024-08-31T00:19:47","slug":"ca7-sw-affiant-doesnt-have-to-explore-all-defs-possible-defenses-in-affidavit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=58788","title":{"rendered":"CA7: SW affiant doesn&#8217;t have to explore all of def&#8217;s possible defenses in affidavit"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>When the affiant officer establishes probable cause for a search warrant, he or she isn\u2019t required to explore all the defenses or affirmative defenses the search target may have to put in the affidavit. Here, this arose in the context of a Franks challenge that fails. <a href=\"https:\/\/media.ca7.uscourts.gov\/cgi-bin\/OpinionsWeb\/processWebInputExternal.pl?Submit=Display&amp;Path=Y2024\/D08-28\/C:23-2151:J:Brennan:aut:T:fnOp:N:3255418:S:0\">Schimandle v. Dekalb Cty. Sheriff&#8217;s Office<\/a>, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 21883 (7th Cir. Aug. 28, 2024).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Defendant\u2019s motion to suppress the contents of his cell phone based on the passcode being covered by marital privilege but disclosed to the police by his wife is denied. She had regular control of the cell phone, had the password, and it\u2019s not covered by marital privilege. United States v. Bonilla, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154601 (D.P.R. Aug. 26, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Defendant\u2019s boat was stopped by Florida Fish and Wildlife officers. One of the occupants of the boat opened a cooler revealing its contents. This was not an illegal search. Suppression order reversed. State v. Vinokurov, 2024 Fla. App. LEXIS 6714 (Fla. 3d DCA Aug. 28, 2024).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>When the affiant officer establishes probable cause for a search warrant, he or she isn\u2019t required to explore all the defenses or affirmative defenses the search target may have to put in the affidavit. Here, this arose in the context &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=58788\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[51,114,18,133],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-58788","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-plain-view","category-privileges","category-reasonable-expectation-of-privacy","category-warrant-papers"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58788","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=58788"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58788\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":58790,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58788\/revisions\/58790"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=58788"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=58788"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=58788"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}