{"id":58719,"date":"2024-08-26T06:21:05","date_gmt":"2024-08-26T11:21:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=58719"},"modified":"2024-08-26T06:21:05","modified_gmt":"2024-08-26T11:21:05","slug":"oh8-citizen-informants-911-call-was-rs-under-navarette","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=58719","title":{"rendered":"OH8: Citizen informant&#8217;s 911 call was RS under <em>Navarette<\/em>"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>The citizen informant\u2019s 911 call that defendant was drunk, belligerent, and driving gave reasonable suspicion to stop defendant under Naverette. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.ohio.gov\/rod\/docs\/pdf\/8\/2024\/2024-Ohio-3192.pdf\">City of Parma v. Coyne<\/a>, 2024-Ohio-3192, 2024 Ohio App. LEXIS 3019 (8th Dist. Aug. 22, 2024).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cAnd here, even expunging the information derived from Defendant&#8217;s suppressed interview, the warrant affidavit establishes the requisite probable cause.\u201d The trial court erred in suppressing. State v. Broussard, 2024 La. App. LEXIS 1328 (La. App. 3 Cir Aug. 21, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cOfc. Kraft was acting diligently in the course of a missing person investigation, and the facts and circumstances he knew about Josephson&#8217;s disappearance at the time he spotted the Impala two blocks from the location where Josephson was last seen surpassed the threshold of a \u2018mere hunch or unparticularized suspicion.\u2019 Further, after Ofc. Kraft&#8217;s blue lights were activated, Appellant turned the wrong way down a one-way road. This fact coupled with Appellant&#8217;s lack of identification, the apparent odor of marijuana emanating from the car, and Appellant&#8217;s flight on foot permitted further detention by law enforcement pursuant to Robinson.\u201d State v. Rowland, 2024 S.C. App. LEXIS 70 (Aug. 21, 2024).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The citizen informant\u2019s 911 call that defendant was drunk, belligerent, and driving gave reasonable suspicion to stop defendant under Naverette. City of Parma v. Coyne, 2024-Ohio-3192, 2024 Ohio App. LEXIS 3019 (8th Dist. Aug. 22, 2024). \u201cAnd here, even expunging &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=58719\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,21,35],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-58719","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-emergency-exigency","category-franks-doctrine","category-reasonable-suspicion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58719","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=58719"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58719\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":58720,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58719\/revisions\/58720"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=58719"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=58719"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=58719"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}