{"id":58005,"date":"2024-06-02T16:11:45","date_gmt":"2024-06-02T21:11:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=58005"},"modified":"2024-06-02T16:11:45","modified_gmt":"2024-06-02T21:11:45","slug":"e-d-mich-younger-bars-federal-injunction-against-state-criminal-prosecution","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=58005","title":{"rendered":"E.D.Mich.: Younger<\/em> bars federal injunction against state criminal prosecution"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Younger bars an injunction against defendant\u2019s criminal prosecution for an alleged illegal search. McDowell v. Plymouth Twp. Police Dep’t, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96568 (E.D. Mich. May 30, 2024).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cReasonable jurists could not disagree with the district court’s denial of Moore’s claim that his Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights were violated by the denial of his motion to suppress and the admission of the results of his blood-alcohol test.\u201d Ohio law provided a remedy, and disagreement with the results isn\u2019t reason for habeas. CoA denied. Moore v. Hildebrand, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 12915 (6th Cir. May 29, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThe officers had reason to believe that evidence of a crime was in the vehicle. At the suppression hearing, the district court found that knowledge concerning Broussard’s activity the morning of the arrest and months-long investigation established probable cause. A few hours before the stop, law enforcement observed Broussard, a convicted felon, with a handgun around a known drug trafficking house. Broussard went out of sight and, simultaneously, a Honda Accord was seen leaving the premises. This amounted to probable cause to pull Broussard over because, although the officers were not certain Broussard was in the Honda, the officers correctly relied on their own inferences and experiences to stop the car.\u201d United States v. Broussard, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 12891 (5th Cir. May 29, 2024).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Younger bars an injunction against defendant\u2019s criminal prosecution for an alleged illegal search. McDowell v. Plymouth Twp. Police Dep’t, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96568 (E.D. Mich. May 30, 2024). \u201cReasonable jurists could not disagree with the district court’s denial of … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[126,20,132],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-58005","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-issue-preclusion","category-probable-cause","category-unreasonable-application--2254d"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58005","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=58005"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58005\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":58006,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58005\/revisions\/58006"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=58005"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=58005"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=58005"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}