The DEA\u2019s failure to make a detailed inventory is not grounds to suppress the inventory, citing cases from other circuits. United States v. Veale, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88011 (D.N.M. May 15, 2024).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Sometimes clients are their own worst enemy with social media. After a search of defendant\u2019s house produced a relatively small quantity of marijuana and a gun, defendant posted on Snapchat that the police missed the bulk of his marijuana, with a photograph of a backpack. United States v. Roberson, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 11844 (6th Cir. May 14, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The affidavit for warrant showed a substantial basis for believing evidence subject to seizure would be found. \u201cThat the affidavit could have been written more clearly provides no basis for reversal. Cf. United States v. Zelaya-Veliz, 94 F.4th 321, 335-36 (4th Cir. 2024) (warning that courts should not rely on a ‘hypertechnical, rather than a commonsense, interpretation of the warrant affidavit\u2019 (cleaned up)).\u201d United States v. Darosa<\/a>, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 11867 (4th Cir. May 16, 2024).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The DEA\u2019s failure to make a detailed inventory is not grounds to suppress the inventory, citing cases from other circuits. United States v. Veale, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88011 (D.N.M. May 15, 2024). Sometimes clients are their own worst enemy … Continue reading