In a search of medical records, records were seized in excess of the scope of a prior Patient Records Order for information other than patient drug abuse, but that did not warrant suppression here because the Fourth Amendment was not violated. A statutory violation alone doesn\u2019t warrant suppression. United States v. Norris, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76033 (D. Me. Apr. 26, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cHowever, the Appellants attempt to frame the rights they assert as \u2018straight forward and well established: the right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure, the right to bodily integrity, the right to privacy, and the right to equal protection under the laws.\u2019 \u2026 The Appellants’ framing is the type of \u2018broad general proposition\u2019 that does not pass muster under the qualified immunity inquiry and is too abstract to provide guidance to reasonable state officials. Saucier, 533 U.S. at 201.\u201d Wright-Gottshall v. New Jersey, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 10158 (3d Cir. Apr. 26, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant established a prima facie case of a Franks violation that significant information was omitted. It, however, was not material to the probable cause finding. United States v. Norris, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76032 (D. Me. Apr. 26, 2024).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
In a search of medical records, records were seized in excess of the scope of a prior Patient Records Order for information other than patient drug abuse, but that did not warrant suppression here because the Fourth Amendment was not … Continue reading