A petition for writ of mandamus doesn\u2019t lie parallel to an action before the USMJ to unseal search warrant materials. Martino v. United States Dist. Court for the E. Dist. of Pa., 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74349 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 24, 2024).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant was in possession of the cell phone of another, so he had no standing to complain of its search. State v. Davis, 2024 Del. Super. LEXIS 346 (Apr. 18, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cThe Fourth Amendment does not require a traffic stop to be completed within a set time frame. \u2026 [\u00b6] This stop was reasonable in length. This stop comprised several segments\u2014ticket one, the inventory search, ticket two, and the consent search. Gallo pulled Defendant over at 20:08 for driving with a suspended license. Defendant could not legally drive away. However, other officers needed to arrive and inventory the car before it could be towed.\u201d United States v. McKenzie, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74323 (M.D. Fla. Apr. 24, 2024).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
A petition for writ of mandamus doesn\u2019t lie parallel to an action before the USMJ to unseal search warrant materials. Martino v. United States Dist. Court for the E. Dist. of Pa., 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74349 (E.D. Pa. Apr. … Continue reading