The drug dog\u2019s sticking his nose in the open window of defendant’s car was a search, and here without probable cause. United States v. Handley, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64531 (N.D. Iowa Apr. 9, 2024).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
This search warrant is particular enough to leave little discretion in the officer. United States v. Washington, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66335 (S.D. Miss. Apr. 11, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cJasme asks the court to order the government to produce certain items related to his arrest and detention in Haiti, which he believes will support his motion to dismiss under Toscanino. \u2026 Because Jasme’s argument in support of dismissal is not recognized in the Seventh Circuit, the conduct occurring in Haiti would not support a dismissal of the charges against him, and therefore the requested items are not relevant.\u201d It is not Brady material either. United States v. Jasme, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61091 (E.D. Wis. Apr. 3, 2024).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The drug dog\u2019s sticking his nose in the open window of defendant’s car was a search, and here without probable cause. United States v. Handley, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64531 (N.D. Iowa Apr. 9, 2024). This search warrant is particular … Continue reading