{"id":57390,"date":"2024-03-20T15:27:46","date_gmt":"2024-03-20T20:27:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=57390"},"modified":"2024-03-20T15:28:41","modified_gmt":"2024-03-20T20:28:41","slug":"wa-parole-search-of-cell-phone-was-reasonable","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=57390","title":{"rendered":"WA: Parole search of cell phone was reasonable"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Defendant was on supervision for a sex offense. He was required to disclose all his dating relationships. A parole search of his cell phone was reasonable, and it revealed other violations. <a href=\"http:\/\/Defendant was on supervision for a sex offense. He was required to disclose all his dating relationships. A parole search of his cell phone was reasonable.  In re Pers. Restraint of Allgoewer, 2024 Wash. App. LEXIS 511 (Mar. 19, 2024). https:\/\/www.courts.wa.gov\/opinions\/pdf\/395057_pub.pdf  2254 petitioner had his full and fair opportunity to litigate his Fourth Amendment claim and did.  Hrytsyak v. Ohio, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48010 (N.D. Ohio Feb. 7, 2024).*  The district court did not adequately explain the search condition on supervised release. Vacated. United States v. Jackson, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 6398 (4th Cir. Mar. 18, 2024).\">In re Pers. Restraint of Allgoewer<\/a>, 2024 Wash. App. LEXIS 511 (Mar. 19, 2024).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>2254 petitioner had his full and fair opportunity to litigate his Fourth Amendment claim and did. Hrytsyak v. Ohio, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48010 (N.D. Ohio Feb. 7, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The district court did not adequately explain the search condition on supervised release. Vacated. United States v. Jackson, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 6398 (4th Cir. Mar. 18, 2024).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Defendant was on supervision for a sex offense. He was required to disclose all his dating relationships. A parole search of his cell phone was reasonable, and it revealed other violations. In re Pers. Restraint of Allgoewer, 2024 Wash. App. &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=57390\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,126,58],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-57390","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cell-phones","category-issue-preclusion","category-probationparole-search"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57390","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=57390"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57390\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":57393,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57390\/revisions\/57393"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=57390"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=57390"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=57390"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}