The CI had \u201cextensive knowledge of street gangs, firearms, and narcotics distribution,\u201d and he\u2019d been providing information for three months. The officers corroborated what they could. What little omissions there were in the affidavit weren\u2019t material to the finding of probable cause. United States v. Cage, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45847 (D. Minn. Mar. 15, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Plaintiff\u2019s unlawful detention suit loses to summary judgment because he didn\u2019t respond to requests for admissions. \u201cBecause the undisputed facts establish that Lt. Bernklau did not fabricate evidence that would result in Conant’s unlawful pretrial detention, Lt. Bernklau is entitled to summary judgment on Conant’s claim.\u201d Conant v. Bernklau, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45892 (E.D. Wis. Mar. 14, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
No claim under Fourth Amendment, ADA, Title VII, or due process clause. Time barred; wrong venue. Emrit v. Grammy Awards on CBS, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46489 (D. Wyo. Feb. 9, 2024).* [Why is this case still going on?]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The CI had \u201cextensive knowledge of street gangs, firearms, and narcotics distribution,\u201d and he\u2019d been providing information for three months. The officers corroborated what they could. What little omissions there were in the affidavit weren\u2019t material to the finding of … Continue reading