Plaintiff was strip searched when civilly committed when she refused to permit a pat search. \u201cConsidering all the circumstances described in Plaintiff’s Complaint, the search Plaintiff underwent, though surely unpleasant, was not unreasonable. \u201cBut even if the Court concluded the search was unreasonable–that the search violated the Fourth Amendment–Plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment claim still would be subject to dismissal because Defendants are entitled to qualified immunity on the claim.\u201d McSean v. Chamberlain, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45018 (E.D. Mo. Mar. 1, 2024).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Pro se plaintiff\u2019s complaint about the town seizing his intellectual property fails on appeal for failure to properly address it. Even so, it appears there was no reasonable expectation of privacy in how he handed it over. Regalado v. Town of Trion, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 6148 (11th Cir. Mar. 14, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Plaintiff doesn\u2019t show that warrantless interviews of her children at school violated the Fourth Amendment. State statute permits this. May v. Dorchester Sch. Dist. Two, 2024 S.C. App. LEXIS 22 (Mar. 13, 2024).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Plaintiff was strip searched when civilly committed when she refused to permit a pat search. \u201cConsidering all the circumstances described in Plaintiff’s Complaint, the search Plaintiff underwent, though surely unpleasant, was not unreasonable. \u201cBut even if the Court concluded the … Continue reading