Defendant sent threatening emails through his Georgia Tech account. He also sent private emails with tax and property information. He raised a Franks challenge, too. Assuming without deciding he has standing to challenge the email search, there was probable cause after removing the challenged information. United States v. Chang, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35870 (N.D. Ga. Mar. 1, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
When the government responds to a motion to suppress that it doesn\u2019t intend to use the challenged evidence, the motion is moot. United States v. Hollman, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36742 (D. Minn. Mar. 4, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant wasn\u2019t seized when he was encountered at a train station and the officer inquired about the smell of marijuana. A reasonable person would still feel free to leave, and he did, running away and abandoning his backpack. United States v. Williams, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35584 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 29, 2024).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Defendant sent threatening emails through his Georgia Tech account. He also sent private emails with tax and property information. He raised a Franks challenge, too. Assuming without deciding he has standing to challenge the email search, there was probable cause … Continue reading