{"id":56941,"date":"2024-01-25T16:50:46","date_gmt":"2024-01-25T21:50:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=56941"},"modified":"2024-01-25T16:50:46","modified_gmt":"2024-01-25T21:50:46","slug":"ia-rs-cries-of-please-help-me-dont-hurt-me-could-lead-an-officer-to-infer-that-an-assault-is-taking-place","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=56941","title":{"rendered":"IA: RS: \u201ccries of \u2018please help me, don&#8217;t hurt me\u2019 could lead an officer to infer that an assault is taking place\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Caller\u2019s \u201ccries of \u2018please help me, don&#8217;t hurt me\u2019 could lead an officer to infer that an assault is taking place.\u201d That was reasonable suspicion. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.iowacourts.gov\/courtcases\/20090\/embed\/CourtAppealsOpinion\">State v. Sinclair<\/a>, 2024 Iowa App. LEXIS 74 (Ct. App. Jan. 24, 2024).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cCordova argues the warrant may be predicated on false or misleading information. But he tenders no evidence to support this claim. At this point, Cordova&#8217;s questions regarding the veracity of the information supporting the warrant are pure speculation. His unsubstantiated assertions do not undermine the validity of the warrant, nor do such claims entitle him to discovery. He must make a threshold showing of falsehood before the factual predicate of the agents&#8217; affidavit may be challenged.\u201d Motion to suppress denied. United States v. Cordova, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12024 (D.N.M. Jan. 23, 2024).* Similar and from the same USDJ the same day is United States v. Boyce, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12020 (D.N.M. Jan. 23, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The dashcam and bodycam videos support the conclusion there was reasonable suspicion. United States v. Reed, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 1550 (6th Cir. Jan. 22, 2024).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Caller\u2019s \u201ccries of \u2018please help me, don&#8217;t hurt me\u2019 could lead an officer to infer that an assault is taking place.\u201d That was reasonable suspicion. State v. Sinclair, 2024 Iowa App. LEXIS 74 (Ct. App. Jan. 24, 2024). \u201cCordova argues &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=56941\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[21,35],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-56941","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-franks-doctrine","category-reasonable-suspicion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56941","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=56941"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56941\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":56942,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56941\/revisions\/56942"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=56941"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=56941"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=56941"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}