Defendant\u2019s objection to the R&R isn\u2019t enough to overrule the USMJ\u2019s finding there was probable cause. Defendant presents a trial defense, not a defense to probable cause. United States v. Cole, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 752 (D. Minn. Jan. 3, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Habeas petitioner raised his Fourth Amendment ineffective assistance of counsel claim in the state courts and the found that they search was valid and not ineffective assistance. These are not unreasonable applications of the law. Crain v. Warden, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 928 (N.D. Ind. Jan. 3, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The evidence on summary judgment did not support exigency to remove a four-year-old child from the home without a court order. Banks v. Herbrich, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 135 (5th Cir. Jan. 3, 2024).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Defendant\u2019s objection to the R&R isn\u2019t enough to overrule the USMJ\u2019s finding there was probable cause. Defendant presents a trial defense, not a defense to probable cause. United States v. Cole, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 752 (D. Minn. Jan. 3, … Continue reading