{"id":56632,"date":"2023-12-23T13:32:09","date_gmt":"2023-12-23T18:32:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=56632"},"modified":"2023-12-23T13:32:09","modified_gmt":"2023-12-23T18:32:09","slug":"w-d-n-c-no-rep-against-being-tracked-by-bait-bill-tracker-from-bank-robbery","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=56632","title":{"rendered":"W.D.N.C.: No REP against being tracked by bait bill tracker from bank robbery"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>There is no reasonable expectation of privacy to not be tracked by a device planted in bait bills taken in a bank robbery. United States v. Day, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 226779 (W.D. N.C. Nov. 6, 2023), adopted 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 226025 (W.D. N.C. Dec. 19, 2023).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Petitioner filed a successor petition seeking to raise a dozen issues. One is a search claim, it is not founded on a new constitutional rule, just that the search was illegal. So dismissed. In re Watson, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 33399 (11th Cir. Dec. 15, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Plaintiff plausibly states a Fourth Amendment claim that the officer\u2019s opening his mailbox and looking at his mail is a claim for relief. At least enough to survive a motion to dismiss. Oats v. McHenry Cty., 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 225630 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 19, 2023).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There is no reasonable expectation of privacy to not be tracked by a device planted in bait bills taken in a bank robbery. United States v. Day, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 226779 (W.D. N.C. Nov. 6, 2023), adopted 2023 U.S. &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=56632\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[126,18,73],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-56632","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-issue-preclusion","category-reasonable-expectation-of-privacy","category-search"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56632","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=56632"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56632\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":56633,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56632\/revisions\/56633"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=56632"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=56632"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=56632"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}