{"id":56613,"date":"2023-12-21T10:01:10","date_gmt":"2023-12-21T15:01:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=56613"},"modified":"2023-12-21T11:19:18","modified_gmt":"2023-12-21T16:19:18","slug":"ga-a-court-order-for-medical-records-by-statute-requires-pc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=56613","title":{"rendered":"GA: A court order for medical records by statute requires PC"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>There is a statutory privacy interest in one\u2019s medical records, and an \u201cappropriate court order\u201d is required for the government to access them in a criminal case. An ex parte order not shown to be based on probable cause is no different than an ex parte subpoena previously held invalid under state law. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gasupreme.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/s23a1158.pdf\">Gates v. State<\/a>, 2023 Ga. LEXIS 261 (Dec. 19, 2023).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Because there are disputed facts underlying the use of force, the denial of qualified immunity was appropriate and the appeal is dismissed. Williams v. Kenton Cty., 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 33527 (6th Cir. Dec. 18, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The search warrant affidavit was wrong that the cell phone was in Utah because after it was pinged it had, unknown to the police, been moved to California. That does not satisfy the substantial preliminary showing required for Franks. United States v. Perez-Espinoza, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 225169 (D. Utah Dec. 15, 2023).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There is a statutory privacy interest in one\u2019s medical records, and an \u201cappropriate court order\u201d is required for the government to access them in a criminal case. An ex parte order not shown to be based on probable cause is &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=56613\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[21,17,40,18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-56613","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-franks-doctrine","category-gps-tracking-data","category-qualified-immunity","category-reasonable-expectation-of-privacy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56613","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=56613"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56613\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":56615,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56613\/revisions\/56615"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=56613"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=56613"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=56613"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}