In Lev Parnas\u2019s case, the search papers are partially unsealed as to former President Trump\u2019s name but kept under seal as to others. He is a public figure, and the others are not. As to Trump, most of this came out in one of the impeachment trials, so it\u2019s hardly a secret anymore. United States v. Parnas, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 220837 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 12, 2023); In re Search Warrants Dated April 21 & April 28, 2021, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 221162 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 12, 2023).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A violation of the Vienna Convention has no private right of action. Forcibly removing the defendant from one country to another was not outrageous conduct under United States v. Alvarez-Machain (1992) and Rochin (1952). United States v. Ramic, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 220740 (W.D. Ky. Dec. 5, 2023).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The court talks about the probable cause while only deciding the good faith exception that the showing was not so bad it couldn\u2019t be relied on by officers. United States v. Schmitz, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 220530 (S.D. Fla. Dec. 4, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
There is no Fourth Amendment due process right. That\u2019s in the Fourteenth Amendment for the states and the Fifth Amendment for the federal government. Pitts v. Roberts, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 220705 (E.D. Wis. Dec. 12, 2023).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
In Lev Parnas\u2019s case, the search papers are partially unsealed as to former President Trump\u2019s name but kept under seal as to others. He is a public figure, and the others are not. As to Trump, most of this came … Continue reading