{"id":56507,"date":"2023-12-12T05:11:28","date_gmt":"2023-12-12T10:11:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=56507"},"modified":"2023-12-12T05:11:28","modified_gmt":"2023-12-12T10:11:28","slug":"ca2-pending-2255-petition-justifies-denial-of-rule-41g-petition","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=56507","title":{"rendered":"CA2: Pending 2255 petition justifies denial of Rule 41(g) petition"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

The business\u2019s petition for return of records obtained by search warrant and grand jury subpoena is denied. The business\u2019s principal is still litigating his criminal case and a 2255 is pending, and that justifies it. Allen v. Grist Mill Capital LLC<\/a>, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 32636 (2d Cir. Dec. 11, 2023).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cell phone warrant was not overbroad. It specified things sought and crimes under investigation. Defendant keys on ring tones on the phone. \u201cRegarding Defendant’s assertion that there could be no potential evidentiary value in ring tones (Doc. 112 at 7), the Court notes that cell phones can be set with a special ring tone associated with certain individuals or groups of individuals, e.g., drug suppliers or clients. See Minto v. United States, Nos. 2:05-CR-22, 2:09-CV-114, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 143644, 2011 WL 6180111, at 4 (E.D. Tenn. Dec. 13, 2011). Thus, ring tones could be of evidentiary value related to the charge of Possession with Intent identified in the Warrant (id. at 1).\u201d \u201cCould be\u201d is enough. United States v. Bellucci, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 219440 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 8, 2023). (E.g., Eric Clapton\u2019s \u201cCocaine\u201d for one person?).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There\u2019s no fixed number of times a person can be Tazed by the police before the officer loses qualified immunity. Est. of Melvin v. City of Colo. Springs, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 32622 (10th Cir. Dec. 11, 2023).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The business\u2019s petition for return of records obtained by search warrant and grand jury subpoena is denied. The business\u2019s principal is still litigating his criminal case and a 2255 is pending, and that justifies it. Allen v. Grist Mill Capital … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,7,40,67],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-56507","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cell-phones","category-overbreadth","category-qualified-immunity","category-rule-41g-return-of-property"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56507","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=56507"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56507\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":56508,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56507\/revisions\/56508"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=56507"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=56507"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=56507"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}