A motorist was stopped and searched and his car was seized, towed, and impounded. Later it was sold by the towing company for expenses. Toyota had a security interest in it. Toyota stated a claim for loss of the car. Toyota Motor Credit Corp. v. Borough of Wyo., 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 202072 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 9, 2023).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
There was no license plate on the back of defendant\u2019s car. Once stopped, and the officer approached, he could see a temporary tag in the rear window, but it was only visible from a few feet away. That didn\u2019t comply with state law. State v. Core, 2023-Ohio-4061 (2d Dist. Nov. 9, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The officer here saw what was believed to be a hand to hand drug transaction at a motel. As the officer approached, defendant walked into the hotel property and wandered around. It turned out he wasn\u2019t a guest there. His stop was with reasonable suspicion. State v. Partin, 2023-Ohio-4056 (2d Dist. Nov. 9, 2023).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
A motorist was stopped and searched and his car was seized, towed, and impounded. Later it was sold by the towing company for expenses. Toyota had a security interest in it. Toyota stated a claim for loss of the car. … Continue reading