An outbound border search is also governed by the border search exception, and there is no requirement the officer state the statute, regulation, or reason for the stop to make it reasonable. United States v. Rivas, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57428 (D. Ariz. May 27, 2011).<\/p>\n
In a murder case, the defendant claimed that the warrant was invalid for a Franks violation because of a statement that somebody forged a signature to a car title. Removing that information from affidavit still left \u201coverwhelming\u201d probable cause for the search warrant. A search warrant is for collection of evidence, and it is not the place for the officer to make his or her case for arrest of the defendant. State v. St. Louis<\/a>, 128 Conn. App. 703, 18 A.3d 648 (2011).*<\/p>\n The exclusionary rule does not apply to probation revocation proceedings. State v. Thackston<\/a>, 289 Ga. 412 (2011), rev\u2019g Thackston v. State, 303 Ga. App. 718, 694 S.E.2d 136 (2010).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading