State law jurisdiction of the officers involved isn\u2019t cognizable in a 2254. McDowell v. Hainesworth, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 187496 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 18, 2023).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Petitioner doesn\u2019t get a CoA to appeal his 2255. He provides no basis for concluding that defense counsel was ineffective in not pursuing a Fourth Amendment claim. Cyr v. Crow, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 27636 (10th Cir. Oct. 18, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The tracking warrant for defendant\u2019s vehicle had plenty of probable cause supporting it. United States v. Shaw, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 27640 (2d Cir. Oct. 18, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The officer shot and killed a motorist during a highspeed chase. There was no clearly established law that it was a Fourth Amendment violation. (All the case law suggests that it was justified.) Tousis v. Billiot, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 27699 (7th Cir. Oct. 18, 2023).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
State law jurisdiction of the officers involved isn\u2019t cognizable in a 2254. McDowell v. Hainesworth, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 187496 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 18, 2023). Petitioner doesn\u2019t get a CoA to appeal his 2255. He provides no basis for concluding … Continue reading