Seizure of defendant\u2019s car key from around his neck to open glove compartment was with probable cause to search the car interior. His cell phone was also seized and then searched with a warrant. It is not challenged. United States v. Wynn, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 187031 (E.D. Ky. Oct. 18, 2023).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cJohnson argues, however, that the stop was unconstitutionally prolonged because it took twenty-three minutes. The Court does not find twenty-three minutes to be an especially long traffic stop. Furthermore, to the extent that there was any delay during this stop, it was caused by Johnson and Hill’s vague and conflicting stories, their inability to ever find the rental agreement, and Johnson lying regarding whether he had drug convictions. Therefore, the stop was not unconstitutionally prolonged.\u201d United States v. Johnson, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 186707 (N.D. Ohio Oct. 18, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The search warrant affidavit was not so lacking in its showing of probable cause that the good faith exception shouldn\u2019t apply. United States v. LeTterlough, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 27628 (3d Cir. Oct. 18, 2023).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Seizure of defendant\u2019s car key from around his neck to open glove compartment was with probable cause to search the car interior. His cell phone was also seized and then searched with a warrant. It is not challenged. United States … Continue reading