The court reiterates that a CI\u2019s successful track record supports his reliability. State v. Mosley, 2023 Minn. LEXIS 451 (Sep. 6, 2023).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The exclusionary rule does not apply to supervised release violations. Defendant\u2019s panicking to a felony arrest was \u201cnot an applicable defense in this context.\u201d United States v. Chavez, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 155113 (D.N.M. Sep. 1, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
There was probable cause for the warrant here. It was based on a six week investigation and showed enough. An extraneous reference to a vehicle on the cover page was a typo that could be overlooked. It was argued that it created confusion, but not as a typo. United States v. Johnson, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156307 (D. Vt. Sep. 5, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Plaintiff\u2019s suit over his involuntary confession from a false arrest is barred by the Younger doctrine. Destin v. Florida, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 23644 (11th Cir. Sep. 5, 2023).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The court reiterates that a CI\u2019s successful track record supports his reliability. State v. Mosley, 2023 Minn. LEXIS 451 (Sep. 6, 2023). The exclusionary rule does not apply to supervised release violations. Defendant\u2019s panicking to a felony arrest was \u201cnot … Continue reading