The search warrant papers involving search of property of a U.S. Representative are not unsealed yet. The redactions were nearly everywhere and it would not make sense. The interests in temporary nondisclosure are more important here; the government has made a compelling case for nondisclosure for the time being. In re Associate Press, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 155066 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 1, 2023).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant\u2019s firearms were in plain view when he had an accident. His arrest would have led to an inventory anyway. United States v. Burnley, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154915 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 1, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
While the court denies review of a racial disparity in traffic stops case, there is a vigorous dissent that disparity was proved. State v. Johnson<\/a>, 2023 N.C. LEXIS 584 (Sep. 1, 2023).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The search warrant papers involving search of property of a U.S. Representative are not unsealed yet. The redactions were nearly everywhere and it would not make sense. The interests in temporary nondisclosure are more important here; the government has made … Continue reading