{"id":55718,"date":"2023-08-29T10:50:23","date_gmt":"2023-08-29T15:50:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=55718"},"modified":"2023-08-29T10:50:23","modified_gmt":"2023-08-29T15:50:23","slug":"ca5-arrest-of-ptf-for-social-media-joke-about-police-violated-1a-and-4a","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=55718","title":{"rendered":"CA5: Arrest of ptf for social media joke about police violated 1A and 4A"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Defendant officer\u2019s arrest of plaintiff for terrorizing under state law for a social media post joke about the police violated clearly established law and violated the First Amendment, too. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.courthousenews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/fifth-circuit-waylon-bailey-order.pdf\">Bailey v. Iles<\/a>, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 22503 (5th Cir. Aug. 25, 2023).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Defendant filed a second motion to suppress after denial of the first motion. Treating it as a motion to reopen, defendant doesn\u2019t allege a sufficient reason to have not pursued the same factual issue before. Denied. United States v. Pope, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 150761 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 28, 2023).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Disagreement with a district court\u2019s suppression ruling is subject to appeal. Reconideration here wasn\u2019t appropriate. There\u2019s no reason here why the court couldn\u2019t decide the case on inevitable discovery, an agrument implicit in the government\u2019s response. United States v. Pope, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 150761 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 28, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cThe agents knew Jones had been convicted of a felony, and they knew he was now prohibited from possessing a firearm. The question for us is whether the district court&#8217;s finding that the agents saw Jones in possession of a firearm is clearly erroneous.\u201d It was not. United States v. Jones, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 22592 (10th Cir. Aug. 28, 2023).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Defendant officer\u2019s arrest of plaintiff for terrorizing under state law for a social media post joke about the police violated clearly established law and violated the First Amendment, too. Bailey v. Iles, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 22503 (5th Cir. Aug. &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=55718\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[126,20,35],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-55718","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-issue-preclusion","category-probable-cause","category-reasonable-suspicion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55718","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=55718"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55718\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":55719,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55718\/revisions\/55719"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=55718"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=55718"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=55718"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}